Perhaps I'm wrong, but at some point I got the idea that the resource way of doing it (using the browser directory etc...) was meant to simplify the TTW experience for persons who might be doing quick tweaks etc....

On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 10:21 PM, Volodymyr Rudnytskyy <wald@quintagroup.com> wrote:
> The current plone3 paster recipe creates skin-related files in more than one
> location. Does anyone have any thoughts on why it would be good practices to
> put skin related information into the browser directory?
>
> I'm leaning towards asking for a paster recipe revision so that skins
> information stays in the skins folder and nowhere else (and I'd like to
> recommend this as a best practice).
>

As far as I understand it is the correct zope 3 way. Skinning becames more
complicated (compare to skinning for plone 2) for pure css designers. It forse
them to learn things that are not a designer's stuff. Personally I am anxious
about this. This makes me think that even with the deliverance skinning won't
be that simple for a designer. Sorry for this pessimistic  thought :)

--
Archive: http://www.openplans.org/projects/ootb-plone-themes/lists/ootb-plone-themes-discussion/archive/2008/05/1209698497177
To unsubscribe send an email with subject unsubscribe to ootb-plone-themes-discussion@lists.openplans.org.  Please contact ootb-plone-themes-discussion-manager@lists.openplans.org for questions.